<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future of General Motors retirement pensions?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://1-pensions.com/future-of-general-motors-retirement-pensions/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://1-pensions.com/future-of-general-motors-retirement-pensions</link>
	<description>Pension Planning and Planning for Retirement</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: digdowndeepnseattle</title>
		<link>http://1-pensions.com/future-of-general-motors-retirement-pensions/comment-page-1#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>digdowndeepnseattle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1-pensions.com/future-of-general-motors-retirement-pensions#comment-185</guid>
		<description>Steve's right...but if GM goes under and the pension plan is fully funded, or funded above the amount that the PBGC would guarantee, then the larger amount would be paid.   Recent tax law changes required that companies work towards a fully funded status to prevent the risk from falling onto the PBGC and the government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve&#8217;s right&#8230;but if GM goes under and the pension plan is fully funded, or funded above the amount that the PBGC would guarantee, then the larger amount would be paid.   Recent tax law changes required that companies work towards a fully funded status to prevent the risk from falling onto the PBGC and the government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dagodagodoo</title>
		<link>http://1-pensions.com/future-of-general-motors-retirement-pensions/comment-page-1#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>dagodagodoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 01:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1-pensions.com/future-of-general-motors-retirement-pensions#comment-184</guid>
		<description>The first link good answer from the person above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first link good answer from the person above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve D</title>
		<link>http://1-pensions.com/future-of-general-motors-retirement-pensions/comment-page-1#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1-pensions.com/future-of-general-motors-retirement-pensions#comment-183</guid>
		<description>For 65year old pbgc would be taken over by the defined benefit plans are drained to terminate in 2008 pbgc would be taken over by the worst that gm goes bankrupt and the monthly pension payments if the monthly pension benefit guarantee corp which would guarantee up to about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For 65year old pbgc would be taken over by the defined benefit plans are drained to terminate in 2008 pbgc would be taken over by the worst that gm goes bankrupt and the monthly pension payments if the monthly pension benefit guarantee corp which would guarantee up to about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

